E-mail: [email protected] Whatsapp: +8613647327093 Tel: +86-731-8403-0163
E-mail: [email protected] Whatsapp: +8613647327093 Tel: +86-731-8403-0163
In the actual procurement process of auger tools, many construction teams tend to focus only on confirming the diameter of the drill tool. However, this diameter-centric selection approach often overlooks the deeper factors that truly influence the construction performance of auger tools.
In fact, the diameter of the drill tool is only the most basic and superficial parameter. It does not reflect the tool's slag discharge capacity, cutting efficiency, force stability, wear resistance, nor can it determine whether it can withstand high-torque, high-strength complex working conditions. Many issues such as slow drilling speed, borehole wall collapse, rapid wear of the drill tool, and even weld cracking are not rooted in the diameter, but rather in more critical and professional parameters such as pitch, blade thickness, core rod material, wear-resistant layer process, and tooth arrangement.
It is precisely for this reason that among auger tools with the same appearance and diameter, there often occurs situations where "the price differs by double, the lifespan differs by three times, and the efficiency differs by five times." What truly determines construction efficiency, borehole quality, and service life is never "how big the size is," but rather the design philosophy and material process hidden behind the drill tool.
For auger tools, pitch is the core design parameter most easily overlooked yet most directly affecting drilling efficiency. The size of the pitch not only determines the slag discharge speed but also determines whether the drill tool is stable and smooth during the drilling process, and even relates to the torque consumption of the drill rig. A reasonable pitch is the key to an auger tool being "fast and stable."
Pitch Too Small: Slow Slag Discharge, Prone to Blockage, Directly Slowing Drilling Speed
When the pitch is designed too small, the slag storage space between the spiral blades is limited, and soil cannot be smoothly discharged upward during drilling, easily causing blockages within the drill body. This leads to:
1) Untimely slag discharge, mud cake accumulation, the drill tool "cannot bite into the soil," and significantly slower penetration,
2) Increased torque rebound, higher drill rig load,
3) In clay with high water content, mud cake adhesion is more likely to occur, making drilling increasingly heavier.
4) This situation is very typical in soft clay layers: drilling is not laborious, but slag discharge is difficult, leading to overall efficiency decline.
Pitch Too Large: Fast Penetration but High Torque Demand, Borehole Shape Prone to Instability
Although an overly large pitch provides more slag discharge space and significantly accelerates drilling speed in relatively loose sandy soil or fill, it also brings new problems:
1) Significantly increased torque demand, requiring higher drill rig power,
2) When the spiral angle is too large, the drill tool is prone to significant vibration, affecting operational comfort,
3) Increased borehole wall disturbance, potentially leading to an out-of-round borehole shape and loose borehole walls, increasing the difficulty of subsequent casing or reinforcement cage lowering.
4) Especially in weathered layers or strata containing less gravel, an overly large pitch may cause the drill tool to jump and deviate, affecting borehole quality.
How to Choose a Reasonable Pitch? – Must Match Based on Stratum Characteristics
There is no absolute standard for pitch being "the larger the better" or "the smaller the more stable." The key lies in matching the stratum conditions. The following principles can be referenced:
1) Soft Clay Layer:
Recommended: Medium pitch
Goal: Ensure smooth slag discharge, avoid mud cake accumulation
2) Sand Layer, Backfill, Loose Soil Layer:
Recommended: Larger pitch
Goal: Rapid slag discharge, improve drilling speed
3) Silty Soil, Miscellaneous Fill Layer, Slightly Weathered Layer:
Recommended: Small to medium pitch
Goal: Reduce vibration, maintain stable borehole shape
4) Weathered Rock, Gravel Interlayer:
Recommended: Small to medium pitch prioritizing stability
Goal: Improve guidance and impact resistance
Many high-quality auger tool manufacturers design corresponding blade angle and pitch combinations for different geologies to ensure optimal results in various strata.
The blades of an auger tool are the core components directly involved in cutting, breaking soil, and discharging slag. Their thickness not only relates to the strength of the drill tool but also affects the accuracy of the borehole size and the reliability of the drill tool's lifespan. Many construction problems, such as drill tool shaking, borehole diameter being too small or large, and rapid blade wear, are often related to unreasonable blade thickness.
Blades Too Thin: Deformation, Burring, Rapid Wear, Unstable Borehole Size
When the blade thickness is designed too thin, it may seem lightweight and material-saving, but the drawbacks in actual work are obvious:
1) Prone to deformation and burring: In hard layers or soil layers with small gravel, thin blades are easily deformed by impact force,
2) Fast wear rate: After the blades become thinner, wear resistance decreases, often resulting in sharpened edges and curled openings after just a few days of use,
3) Unstable borehole size: After blade deformation, the actual cutting diameter becomes smaller or deviates, causing borehole diameter deviation and uneven borehole walls,
4) Reduced weld fatigue resistance: Thin blades are prone to micro-cracks at the weld, which may lead to weld cracking after continued construction.
This phenomenon is particularly prominent in highly viscous soil, slightly weathered layers, or miscellaneous fill layers containing fragments.
Blades Too Thick: Increased Cutting Resistance, High Drill Rig Load, Increased Energy Consumption
On the other hand, blades are not necessarily thicker the better. Excessive thickness brings another burden:
1) Significantly increased cutting resistance, slower drill tool advancement,
2) Higher torque required for soil breaking, directly leading to increased drill rig load,
3) In soft soil layers, thick blades push too much soil, heavier slag discharge burden,
4) Increased energy consumption, higher fuel consumption, reducing overall construction economy.
Therefore, blade thickness must find a balance between "sufficient strength" and "moderate resistance."
How to Determine the Optimal Blade Thickness? Need to Simultaneously Meet Three Major Conditions
The selection of blade thickness should comprehensively consider the following three key factors, rather than just based on experience or cost:
1) Construction Intensity (Whether long-term continuous operation)
Projects with long-term continuous drilling and high load are suitable for thickened blades,
Intermittent construction or work in soft soil layers can use standard thickness to reduce energy consumption.
2) Stratum Hardness (Affects blade rigidity requirement)
Hard plastic soil, silty soil, slightly weathered layer → Appropriately thickened
Sand layer, soft layer → Medium thickness is sufficient
Gravel interlayer, strongly weathered layer → Must use heavy-duty thickened type
3) Equipment Torque (Whether the drill rig can drive it)
High torque hosts can be paired with thicker blades to improve impact resistance and wear resistance,
Small equipment needs to control thickness to avoid excessive cutting resistance causing "inability to push."
Optimizing Blade Thickness Can Significantly Reduce Deformation and Weld Cracking
Reasonable blade thickness not only improves cutting efficiency but also significantly enhances drill tool stability and lifespan:
1) Deformation resistance improved by 30–60%
2) Weld cracking probability reduced by more than 50%
3) More stable borehole size, reducing rework or hole cleaning times
4) Significantly reduce mid-construction stoppages and factory returns due to blade damage
In many construction cases, only optimizing blade thickness can extend drill tool service life by at least 1.5–3 times.
The core rod (main shaft) of an auger tool is the "backbone" of the entire drill tool, responsible for affording the torque from the drill rig, axial pressure, and impact loads during construction. No matter how good the drill tool's appearance, how reasonable the pitch, or how wear-resistant the blades, if the core rod material is substandard, the lifespan of the entire drill tool will be greatly reduced, or it may even bend or break directly under heavy load conditions, causing irreparable construction losses.
Whether the core rod is good or not ultimately depends on three key factors: material strength, toughness performance, and quenching process.
Material Strength, Toughness and Heat Treatment process – The Core Determining Torsional and Bending Resistance
The core rod affords three main mechanical actions in actual construction:
1) Strong torque: Continuous rotational cutting applies huge torsional force to the core rod,
2) Axial pressure: Drill rig advancement, downward pressure transmitted to the core rod,
3) Impact load: Instantaneous impact occurs when encountering gravel blocks or hard interlayers.
Therefore, a high-quality core rod must possess:
1) High strength: Not easily twisted, strong compression resistance,
2) High toughness: Does not brittle fracture upon impact,
3) Excellent quenching treatment: Achieves the best balance of material hardness, strength, and ductility.
These factors determine whether the core rod is "easy to use" and "durable," and also determine whether it can cope with complex working conditions.
Comparison of Common Core Rod Materials: Different Materials Correspond to Different "Fighting Capacity"
1) Ordinary Carbon Steel: Lowcost, but prone to fatigue
Advantages: Low price, easy processing,
Disadvantages: Limited strength and toughness, weak torsional resistance,
Usage risks:
Prone to fatigue cracks during long-term continuous construction,
May twist or even bend when encountering hard layers.
Suitable for light load, small drill rigs, or occasionally used working conditions.
2) Alloy Steel: Good comprehensive performance, is the mainstream choice
Alloy steel significantly improves strength, toughness, and wear resistance by adding alloy elements such as chromium, molybdenum, and manganese.
Advantages include:
Significantly improved torsional performance,
Stable bending and impact resistance performance,
Can meet the vast majority of engineering working conditions when paired with good quenching process.
It is the best cost-performance choice for medium and large drill rigs, conventional engineering, and high-frequency usage scenarios.
3) Special Reinforced Steel: Born for High Torque, High Difficulty Working Conditions
This type of material usually undergoes:
Rare material reinforcement technology,
Deep layer heat treatment,
Overall thickening design,
Some manufacturers use "ultra-high toughness structural steel" or "deep quenched alloy steel."
Suitable for:
Gravel layer
Weathered layer
Strong impact stratum
Long-term continuous full-load construction
Under these working conditions, its fatigue resistance and torsional stability are far superior to ordinary alloy steel.
Why Must High Torque Drill Rigs Choose "Thickened Core Rod + Alloy Steel"?
With the increasing popularity of large-tonnage rotary drilling rigs and high-torque drill rigs, traditional thin-walled carbon steel core rods can no longer meet construction intensity. Must adopt:
Thickened core rod – Improve overall rigidity, reduce bending
High-strength alloy steel – Provide higher torsional and fatigue resistance
Such a combination can significantly avoid the three most common core rod accidents in construction:
1) Twisting deformation: The core rod is twisted like a "twisted dough"
2) Bent rod: The core rod undergoes permanent bending after encountering a hard interlayer
3) Fracture accident: Weld or body fractures due to fatigue stress, seriously affecting construction progress
Once such accidents occur, they not only affect the efficiency, but in severe cases, can also cause the drill tool to fall into the hole, equipment shutdown, and even require fishing, the cost of which is far greater than that of a high-quality core rod.
Summary: Core rod material is the root of auger tool durability and safety.
Among all structural parameters, the core rod material is the part that should not be saved on and cannot be ignored. It determines whether the drill tool can cope with high-torque, high-impact construction environments and is the foundation of overall performance.
In other words: Blades determine efficiency, the wear-resistant layer determines lifespan, but the core rod determines whether the drill tool can "hold up."
The wear-resistant layer of an auger tool is often the detail most easily overlooked by construction teams, but its impact on the drill tool's lifespan, borehole accuracy, and construction cost is extremely critical. Especially in projects with strong abrasiveness and long continuous operation times, whether the wear-resistant layer can withstand impact and friction directly determines whether the drill tool can work stably for a whole day, or even persist through a project. A high-quality wear-resistant layer is the essential difference between an auger tool being "usable" and "durable."
Comparison of Common Wear-Resistant process Methods: Different process Determine Different Lifespans
Currently, auger tools mainly use two types of wear-resistant treatment process:
1) Welding Rod Build-up Welding (Traditional process)
Uses ordinary welding rods to build up a wear-resistant layer on the blades or key stress points,
Simple construction, low cost,
Common in mid-to-low-end drill tool manufacturers.
2) Alloy Wear-Resistant Strip (Mid-to-High-End process)
Uses special wear-resistant alloy strips or build-up welding rods for reinforcement treatment,
Alloy strip materials contain high-hardness elements such as tungsten and chromium,
Heat treatment and welding process are more stringent.
These two wear-resistant methods differ greatly in durability, adhesion, and applicable strata.
Analysis of Advantages and Disadvantages of Different process: Wear Resistance, Adhesion, Impact Resistance, Applicable Stratum
1) Wear Resistance Comparison
-Welding Rod Build-up Welding:
General hardness, limited wear resistance effect, easily worn flat.
-Alloy Wear-Resistant Strip:
High hardness, strong wear resistance, can withstand long-term abrasion.
Conclusion: The wear resistance of alloy strips is usually 2–4 times that of welding rod build-up welding.
2) Adhesion and Stability Comparison
-Welding Rod Build-up Welding:
Prone tofalling off and peeling under high vibration, high impact working conditions.
-Alloy Wear-Resistant Strip:
Strict welding process, firm combination, even in gravel layers and weathered layers, it is not easy to break off.
3) Impact Resistance Comparison
-Welding Rod Build-up Welding:
Higher brittleness, once impacted by stones, it may cause material loss and cracks.
-Alloy Wear-Resistant Strip:
Has better impact resistance, suitable for complex strata such as miscellaneous fill layers and gravel layers.
4) Applicable Stratum Comparison
-Welding Rod Build-up Welding:
Suitable for strata with low abrasiveness such as soil layers, soft soil layers, and slightly weathered layers.
-Alloy Wear-Resistant Strip:
Suitable for high-intensity working conditions such as highly abrasive sand layers, hard miscellaneous fill layers, gravel layers, and strongly weathered layers.
The Impact of High-Quality Wear-Resistant Layer on Drill Tool Lifespan: Not a Little, but Multiplicative Improvement
Choosing high-quality wear-resistant strips and pairing them with professional heat treatment and welding process can bring very obvious construction benefits.
1) Service Life Improved by 30–70%
Many on-site statistics show:
Only upgrading the wear-resistant layer process can extend drill tool life by 30–70%,
In highly abrasive sand layers and gravel layers, even a 1–2 times life improvement is achieved.
2) Reduce Blade Wear, Ensure Borehole Accuracy
The wear-resistant layer is not just "for durability," it also directly affects borehole quality:
Prevent blade edges from being sharpened and bent,
Maintain the true diameter of the blade, avoid borehole diameter fluctuations,
Reduce hole cleaning and re-drilling due to borehole diameter deviation.
Crucial for pile foundation projects with high quality requirements.
3) Reduce Rework Times and Maintenance Costs
After strengthening the wear-resistant layer, construction teams can obviously feel:
Lower frequency of drill tool replacement,
Less factory return for repair or even repair welding,
Less construction stoppage due to blade wear,
System fuel consumption decreases (drill tool cuts more easily).
Statistics show:
After upgrading the wear-resistant layer, each project can save 15–25% of drill tool consumption cost.
Summary: Although the wear-resistant layer is small, it is a major factor affecting service life.
The wear-resistant layer may seem like just a few hard strips on the blade, but it determines whether the drill tool can survive a complex working condition, maintain borehole standards, and reduce stoppages and rework.
Truly high-quality drill tools will definitely not "save materials, reduce process" on the wear-resistant layer process.
In auger tools, the arrangement of teeth seems like a detail, but it directly affects cutting efficiency, slag discharge balance, and the force stability of the drill tool. A reasonable tooth arrangement design can keep the drill tool rotating smoothly and evenly stressed in different strata, avoiding local overload and drilling deviation.
1) Tooth spacing too dense: Cutting force concentrated, drilling resistance increased, prone to vibration, at the same time, insufficient slag discharge space, sediment and sand tend to accumulate, reducing drilling speed.
2) Tooth spacing too sparse: Although slag discharge is smooth, each tooth bears too much cutting volume, prone to wear, blade stress concentration, and even tooth breakage or core rod overload.
3) Optimized tooth arrangement: Adjust tooth spacing and distribution angle according to stratum hardness and particle characteristics to achieve even cutting, smooth slag discharge, and stable drilling.
In actual engineering, high-quality tooth arrangement design can significantly improve drill tool life by 20–40%, reduce blade wear, and improve borehole accuracy, especially in complex strata such as sand layers, gravel layers, and weathered rock, where its effect is more obvious.
Tooth arrangement is the "invisible governor" in auger tool design, determining the efficiency and stability of the drilling process, and is an important factor that cannot be ignored among the five core parameters.
The performance of a rotary drilling auger tool is never determined by a single parameter, but rather by the combined effect of five core indicators: slag discharge efficiency, overall stability, torque matching, wear resistance, and borehole accuracy. Any weak factor may become the "short board" affecting efficiency. While the five indicators are all at a high level, the comprehensive performance of the drill tool will show a "1+1>2" effect.
Synergistic Effect of the Five Parameters: Determine Construction Efficiency and Borehole Quality
1) Slag Discharge Efficiency – Determines Drilling Speed
Good blade quantity, pitch, and bucket capacity design can quickly transport and discharge soil, reduceidling and stuck drill risks, and improve per-unit-time hole formation efficiency.
2) Stability – Determines Construction Safety and Borehole Shape Quality
Suitable blade thickness, precise welding structure, and reasonable main shaft layout can ensure the drill tool does not shake or deviate in complex strata, significantly improving borehole verticality.
3) Torque Matching – Determines Whether Construction is Laborious
Connection method, main shaft structure, and overall strength determine whether the drill tool can withstand the maximum torque of the drill rig. The higher the torque matching degree, the more "relaxed" the drill rig, with lower energy consumption and higher efficiency.
4) Wear Resistance – Determines Lifespan and Maintenance Cost
High-quality wear-resistant layer and alloy strip welding process can significantly slow down blade and barrel wear, enabling the drill tool to have a longer lifespan and better stability in high-intensity construction.
5) Borehole Accuracy – Determines Final Engineering Quality
Blade structure, cutting edge angle, and wear-resistant layer wear condition all affect the borehole diameter and wall quality. High-precision drill tools can more stably maintain the design borehole diameter, reducing subsequent hole cleaning difficulty.
When the five indicators match and optimize each other, the drill tool not only rotates fast but also rotates steadily, has a long lifespan, and produces good borehole shape.
Why Only Looking at "Diameter" Leads to Low Efficiency and Shortened Lifespan?
Many construction teams only focus on "whether the diameter is correct, whether it can be installed" during procurement, ignoring more critical structural details.
But two drill bits with the same diameter can have a performance gap of 30% to 200%, the reason lies in the hidden key parameters:
Unreasonable slag discharge judgment → Speed cannot be increased
Blades too thin or poor welding → Deformation, fast wear
Wear-resistant strips cutting corners on materials and process → Lifespan plummets
Poor weight distribution → Drill rig torque waste, energy consumption soars
Therefore, "only looking at diameter" is like buying a car only looking at displacement, buying an excavator only looking at tonnage, it overlooks the key indicators that determine true performance. The result is:
Construction efficiency cannot be improved
Failure rate increases
Frequent rework and maintenance
Actual total cost far exceeds expectation
The "Invisible Value" of High-Quality Auger Tools
Truly high-quality drill tools are not only reflected in their sturdy appearance and beautiful structure but also demonstrate irreplaceable value in actual construction:
1) Higher Construction Efficiency
Faster penetration speed
Less shutdown Cleanup
Wider stratum adaptability
Single hole time shortened, which can significantly higher project efficiency.
2) Less Maintenance and Less Rework
Long wear-resistant layer life, high welding strength, good structural stability, enabling the drill tool to maintain good condition even in high-intensity construction, reducing stoppages due to damage.
3) Lower Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
Service life can be extended by 30–70%
Times for tool change, repair welding, and rework reduced
Drill rig energy consumption reduced
Failure and accident risks reduced
Final result: Seemingly more expensive drill tools make the project "more cost-saving."
In rotary pile construction, many construction teams are accustomed to first looking at the drill tool diameter, believing that as long as the borehole diameter matches, the drill tool can work smoothly. However, through the analysis in this article, we can clearly see: the true determining factors of drill tool performance are the comprehensive embodiment of design, material, and process.
The five core parameters – pitch, blade thickness, core rod material, wear-resistant layer process, and tooth arrangement – work together from different angles, affecting drilling efficiency, borehole quality, and drill tool lifespan. Each parameter seems like a detail but plays a decisive role in actual construction:
Design: Pitch and blade thickness determine slag discharge efficiency and cutting stability,
Material: Core rod material and wear-resistant layer determine torsional resistance and durability,
Process: Welding and quenching ensure structural reliability and construction safety.
When these three are properly matched, the drill tool can exert its best performance in different strata, achieving high efficiency, low maintenance, and low total cost.
Therefore, the primary principle for choosing auger tools should start from engineering needs:
Understand stratum characteristics and construction tasks
Judge drill rig torque and working intensity
Match against the five core parameters
Only in this way can you truly select efficient, durable, and cost-effective auger tools, rather than just "size-appropriate" tools.
Please do not only focus on diameter anymore. Understand and apply these core parameters, let every drill tool safeguard your construction efficiency and engineering quality.
Contact Us
